{"id":26620,"date":"2023-06-09T16:56:37","date_gmt":"2023-06-09T16:56:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/helpfulprofessor.com\/?p=26620"},"modified":"2023-09-13T18:51:11","modified_gmt":"2023-09-13T18:51:11","slug":"socialism-pros-and-cons","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/helpfulprofessor.com\/socialism-pros-and-cons\/","title":{"rendered":"20 Socialism Pros and Cons"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"socialism<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Socialism has several pros and cons, which is why it remains an extremely controversial political ideology<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Socialism\u2019s strength is that it tends to provide more equitable access to resources, while its weakness is that it often leads to market inefficiencies that decrease the productivity and prosperity of a nation\u2019s economy over time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Of course, there are many more strengths and weaknesses of socialism, which I\u2019ll explore below.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n

What is Socialism?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Socialism refers to a political ideology which advocates for government ownership of the means of production in order to prevent exploitation of the working-class by a capitalist class.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A scholarly definition would be:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cAn ideology and method of government that advocates state ownership and regulation of industry, and central control over the allocation of resources, rather than allowing these to be determined by market forces.\u201d (Kelly, 2013)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

This ideology was one of two competing ideologies in the 20th<\/sup> Century, the other being Capitalism<\/a>. Most nations today have evolved to embrace some forms of socialism and<\/em> capitalism, with an approach often called the \u2018third way\u2019 or \u2018social democracy\u2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Note that socialism\u2019s definition will affect what is and isn\u2019t considered \u2018socialist\u2019 \u2013 see the end of this article for an explanation of the specific definition of socialism used for the following pros and cons.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Pros of Socialism<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

1. Economic Equality<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Under socialism, the government actively works to redistribute wealth evenly across society, reducing disparities between rich and poor, and limiting social injustices<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Socialists argue this can lead to a more equitable society because no one person can amass extreme amounts of wealth while others suffer in abject poverty (Buchanan, 2000).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We see, for example, that among similar first-world liberal democracies, those that embrace elements of socialism \u2013 such as Iceland, Norway, Sweden and France<\/a> \u2013 tend to have lower levels of income inequality<\/a> than more capitalist-oriented nations like the United States (OECD, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Although, it’s worth noting that even the USA has elements of socialism<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

2. Universal Healthcare Access<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

One of the key features of socialist systems is that government controls and operates essential services such as healthcare, which is typically provided free at the point of service and funded through taxation.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Such an approach guarantees that everyone has universal healthcare<\/a> when they are ill, and access to care becomes a right rather than a privilege afforded only to the wealthy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This, overall, can lead to better public health outcomes and lower levels of healthcare poverty of healthcare debt (Navarro, 2002).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A prime example of a socialized healthcare system is the National Health Service (NHS) in Britain, where doctors and nurses are directly employed by the government and healthcare is provided free at the point of use for all residents (Department of Health and Social Care, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There are, of course, downsides to this model, which will be explored in the cons section.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

3. Job Security<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

One of the ideals of socialism is for the government to manage industry, in a model called the command economy<\/a>. An upside of this is that the government can guarantee employment to citizens, as well as setting wages and conditions centrally.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The idea underpinning this system is that it will provide job security and lower unemployment rates (Rosen, 2014).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In Cuba, for instance, the socialist state guarantees employment for its citizens, leading to a low unemployment rate (World Bank, 2022). However, at the same time, due to the inefficiency of a centrally-managed economy, governments often cannot pay high wages to citizens.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

4. Environmentally Conscious Policies<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Socialism’s focus on long-term societal benefits, rather than short-term profits, can be more conducive to sustainable policies and practices (Foster, 2002).<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Socialists tend to be more inclined to intervene in markets and set rules around industry and business in order to curtail negative externalities. This includes rules about environmental conditions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Green New Deal, a policy package proposed in the United States, has roots in socialist principles and aims to address climate change, environmental justice<\/a>, and economic inequality simultaneously (Roberts, 2019).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

See Also: Environmental Injustice Examples<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

5. Greater Emphasis on Education<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

A core principle of socialism is that people should be allowed to access essential services regardless of wealth. Generally, education is on that list.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Therefore, socialists often emphasize access to free or low-cost education as a way to provide equality of opportunity (Bowles & Gintis, 1976).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, the German higher education system is primarily state-funded, with no tuition fees for undergraduate students at public universities, illustrating how this principle can be put into practice (Federal Ministry of Education and Research, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similarly, even in the United States, the government pays for teachers and schools, and provides education up to Grade 12 free of charge, demonstrating a feature of a socialist mindset even in a highly capitalist nation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A downside here is that it often limits parents’ choice about what is taught at school or which school to go to, which is instead a feature of neoliberal education<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

6. Reduction of Monopolies<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

One of the excesses of capitalism occurs when firms develop monopolies over goods and services<\/a>. Socialism can limit this by nationalizing key industries (Ellerman, 1984).<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Take, for example, the railroads industry. Realistically, only one railroad can operate in a specific location. If a private firm operates that railroad, then they will have an effective monopoly, and can charge excessive prices.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So, for socialists, it\u2019s important to nationalize any industry that will cause a natural monopoly<\/a>. This, in theory, will prevent price gouging and help secure affordable access.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A contemporary example is the electricity market in France, which is predominantly state-owned and regulated (European Commission, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

7. Promotion of Cooperation<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Socialism promotes cooperation<\/a> over competition (Malleson, 2014). In this system, the focus is not on individual gain but rather on collective welfare, leading to a more cohesive society.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

One of the criticisms of competition is that it prevents firms from sharing resources, technologies, and market insights. As a result, the competing firms each have to invest separately into each of these areas, meaning overall social costs rise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cooperative firms in a non-profit oriented system, on the other hand, can work in unison rather than in competition to achieve results.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

8. Focus on Essential Needs<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Socialism often prioritizes ensuring that all citizens have their basic needs met before dealing with excesses and luxuries for the few (Wolff, 2012).<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, instead of wasting money on luxury yachts, the society\u2019s money will go to policies that provide for the people, such as policies that aim to provide housing, food, healthcare, and education for all.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Here\u2019s an example. Despite being a heavily capitalist system, Singapore embraces a hybrid socialist model in its public housing policy. Around 80% of the population lives in state-built apartments, as the government recognizes the important of affordable compact housing in the city-state (Department of Statistics Singapore, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

9. Encourages Long-Term Planning<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

In many socialist economies such as China\u2019s<\/a> and Cuba\u2019s, the socialist government holds a monopoly over politics. In other words, they don\u2019t have to worry about getting voted out any time soon. As a result, they can think more long-term.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is more a pro of authoritarian dictatorships<\/a> (which, of course, I do not endorse!). But, it also tends to be characteristic of most self-proclaimed socialists states. The constitution enshrines a single-party socialist government.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The result is freedom to make big infrastructure investments, long-term plans, and other decisions that aren\u2019t going to be subject to the short-term whims of an electorate that just wants tax cuts and handouts every budget cycle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This approach, while clearly also having its downsides, may lead to better sustainable development and economic foresight (Kotz, 2017).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, the Five-Year Plans implemented by China illustrate the potential for detailed and ambitious long-term planning that addresses broad economic and societal goals (National Development and Reform Commission, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

10. Prevention of Wealth-based Political Power<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Under socialism, wealth is commonly distributed evenly among citizens, limiting the concentration of wealth and thereby preventing the formation of wealth-based political power that can often distort democracy (Winters, 2011).<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In other words, it theoretically should prevent a plutocracy<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is particularly true in socialist-inspired nations that disallow money in politics, ensuring the plutocrats can\u2019t use their money to influence the agenda and exploit their power.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cons of Socialism<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

1. Lack of Economic Incentive<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Perhaps the greatest downside of socialism is that, by human nature, humans will work harder and more productively when we are incentivized by extra rewards.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

But under socialism, we\u2019re often not incentivized to work harder because of either no extra financial reward, or higher taxes on our extra earnings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This can lead to laziness among the workforce, lack of buy-in among the population, and general discontent that leads to lower productivity overall. The economic crisis in Venezuela, characterized by high inflation and shortages of goods, serves as a recent example (Rodriguez, 2018).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

See More: Economic Incentives Examples<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

2. Central Planning Inefficiencies<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Central economic planning can lead to inefficiencies and misallocations of resources. It can be challenging for a central body to accurately determine the needs and wants<\/a> of an entire society, leading to waste and shortages (Hayek, 1945).<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

A prime example of this is in Vietnam, when after the rise of the socialist government, there was an attempt to centrally plan agriculture. This was a disaster, leading to lower crop yields and even food insecurity, because the central government tried to force farmers to grow the wrong crops in the wrong fields.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eventually, under the doi moi <\/em>economic reforms, the Vienamese government had to revert back to allowing farmers to grow their own crops, and allowing them to sell crops for profit, demonstrating one of many failed attempts at 20th<\/sup> Century socialist ideology.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

3. Lack of Entrepreneurship<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Entrepreneurship refers to the practice of starting businesses. In socialism, this tends to be discouraged because ownership of business is seen as a way to amass wealth, causing economic inequality.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

But entrepreneurs have a great way of creating market efficiencies<\/a>. By competing against one another, the small businesses force each other to produce higher-quality goods for cheaper to attract the most customers (a downside of this is it puts downward pressure on wages, which socialists clearly don\u2019t like!).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Furthermore, entrepreneurs are very good at finding holes in the market \u2013 such as missing goods and services in an economic area \u2013 and filling those holes, because they know there\u2019s profit in the gaps.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

4. Potential for Government Abuse<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

When the state controls the economy and its resources, there’s a risk of government abuse or corruption (Holmes, 1995).<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

And we regularly see that, when socialism is implemented out of ideals for fairness and equality, the political class become the self-indulgent oligarchs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Aldous Huxley demonstrates this in his Animal Farm <\/em>analogy, where the animals who enforce communism<\/a> in their farm end up living a rich, indulgent life, while the rest work like slaves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And we see it in real life as well. There are countless examples where socialist states have suppressed dissent, implemented policies that favor elites, and committed human rights violations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Notably, North Korea, a socialist state, has been criticized for widespread human rights abuses (Amnesty International, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

5. Lack of Competition<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

In a socialist economy, the state often controls industries and production, which may lead to a lack of competition.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This can result in inefficiencies, lack of choice for consumers, and potential stagnation (Lindbeck, 1991). An example can be found in the healthcare sector in the Soviet Union, where a lack of competition led to inefficiencies and a lower quality of care compared to countries with competitive healthcare markets (Balabanova, McKee, & Pomerleau, 2004).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

6. Poorer Productivity<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Productivity is stimulated by competition. And competition is eliminated in a socialist economy. As a result, productivity is often decreased.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, if everyone receives equal remuneration regardless of effort or results, high performers may feel unmotivated to strive, and overall productivity could decrease (Mankiw, 2010).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similarly, if the government holds a monopoly over goods and services, there\u2019s less incentive for the government-run industries to innovate and achieve greater productivity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

One real-life example is in Cuba, where Cuba’s agricultural sector has seen productivity issues related to the lack of incentive for hard work and efficiency (Deere, 1991).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

7. Lower Overall Wealth in Society<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

If productivity is curtailed, gaining wealth is discouraged, and there are rampant market inefficiencies, then social wealth overall is likely to decline.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This will lead to economic recession and financial hardship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The capitalists argue that one person gaining wealth isn\u2019t at the expense of anyone else, because of the \u201crising tides lift all boats\u201d philosophy. In this philosophy, it\u2019s good to have wealthy people in society, because they spend a lot of money, stimulating economic growth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

By contrast, wealth in socialist societies tends to be curtailed by market inefficiency and disincentives for entrepreneurship. The opposite of the \u201crising tide\u201d analogy then occurs: there\u2019s less money overall in the economy, making it hard for the government to collect enough money to then redistribute it to the poor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

8. High Tax Burden<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

To support extensive public services, socialist economies often require high taxes, which can be burdensome for citizens (Alesina, Glaeser, & Sacerdote, 2005).<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By definition, socialist societies have larger governments that collect more revenue. That revenue has to come from wither the workers or industry in the form of value-added products and exports.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Even in capitalist countries with some socialist elements, like Sweden and Denmark which are known for their comprehensive welfare states, higher tax rates are imposed to achieve those socialist welfare policies (Svallfors, 2011).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

9. Potential for Brain Drain<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

High achievers and ambitious individuals might emigrate to seek better financial opportunities and escape the limits of an economy where wealth is distributed evenly (Borjas, 1987).<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This phenomenon, termed “brain drain,” was experienced by East Germany during the Cold War, where a significant number of educated citizens moved to the West (Fertig, 2003).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They knew that by working in East Germany, they would earn lower wages than their West German capitalist counterparts, who could bargain with employers for higher wages for their high expertise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

10. Reduced Personal Freedoms<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

In a socialist society, the state often has greater control over various aspects of life, including work and property, potentially leading to reduced personal freedoms (Hayek, 1944).<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The most obvious of these is limited capacity to build a large business or compete in areas where the government has mandated that they should have a monopoly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the extreme case of North Korea, the state exerts control over many aspects of citizens’ lives, including travel, employment, and information (Human Rights Watch, 2022). Although, I would contend that this is a feature of autocratic dictatorships<\/a><\/em> which tends to be an eventuality of socialism, but doesn\u2019t necessarily have to be (Nepal, for example, often freely elects socialist and communist governments).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Can you Even Define Socialism?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Socialism is generally defined as government control over the means of production. But there is debate over how socialist choose to define \u201cthe means of production.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This may strictly only refer to public ownership of factories, farms, and other industries that produce goods<\/em>. Here, water, for example, may be considered a good that is government-owned and sold.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Other definitions include goods and services <\/em>in \u201cthe means of production,\u201d which would bring healthcare, fire services, police services, and even government-maintained public parks under the banner of socialism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But in fact, most socialists argue that anything <\/em>that may produce profit <\/em>should not be privately owned because it will lead to social inequality and a class system<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As Edmundson (2020) argues:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cthe means of production [comprises] anything that is or can be put to productive use \u2026 the means of production consist of anything that enables or could enable the extraction of surplus value (exploitation)\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Simiarly, Socialist Jean Proudhon (1970) goes further, arguing anything \u201cwhose accumulation might introduce social inequality\u201c (good or <\/em>service) should be collectivized.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Still further, a definition of \u201cmeans of production\u201d can also include means of production and distribution<\/em>, which Mohan (1975) argued was generally accepted as a socialist concept:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThere is general agreement however, that it [socialism] aims at \u2018the control by the state\u2019 of the means of distribution like railways, etc. and also banks and similar institutions\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

This definition also brings public roads and other infrastructure under the banner of socialism, or at least socialized <\/em>programs. In the knowledge economy, this may even include internet and telecommunications services.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nevertheless, hardened socialists like Proudhon would still look at the following examples with skepticism because the following government-operated organizations tend not to be run as workers\u2019 cooperatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As you can see, the definition of socialism is extremely contested even by socialists themselves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

One of the difficulties in writing this article was that there are so many different versions of socialism that many of the above pros and cons of socialism are evident in some socialist economies but not others. Many of the above examples therefore represent potential <\/em>strengths and weaknesses, but ones I think have played out in some of the major socialist nations of the 20th<\/sup> and 21st centuries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Overall, I do genuinely believe there are pros and cons of socialist-inspired approaches, and I tend to err on the side of social democracy where capitalism reigns but socialist approaches are sometimes necessary where capitalism fails. I worry that some of my \u2018cons\u2019 of socialism create a strawman argument, because many nations with socialist elements (France, the Scandianvian nations, etc.) tend to be both very wealthy and also don\u2019t shy away from government intervention in the market to protect workers and ensure accessibility of essential services.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At the end of the day, we each will have our own preferences<\/a>, and the most important thing is to maintain a free and fair democracy where we as a society can freely choose <\/em>socialism, capitalism, or a mix.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

References<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Alesina, A., Glaeser, E., & Sacerdote, B. (2005). Work and leisure in the U.S. and Europe: Why so different?. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2005, Volume 20, 1-64. Link<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Amnesty International. (2022). Amnesty International Report 2021\/22 – The State of the World’s Human Rights. Link<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balabanova, D., McKee, M., & Pomerleau, J. (2004). Health service utilization in the former Soviet Union: Evidence from eight countries. Health Services Research, 39<\/em>(6p2), 1927-1950. Link<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Borevi, K. (2014). Multiculturalism and welfare state integration: Swedish model path dependency. Identities, 21<\/em>(6), 708-723. Link<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Borjas, G. J. (1987). Self-Selection and the Earnings of Immigrants. The American Economic Review, 77<\/em>(4), 531-553. Link<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Buchanan, A. (2000). Is there a right to be rich? In M. Clayton & A. Williams (Eds.), The ideal of equality (pp. 34-49). St. Martin’s Press.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Deere, C. D. (1991). Household livelihood and survival strategies in Cuban agriculture during the “Special Period in Peacetime”. Cuba in Transition, 1<\/em>, 325-350. Link<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Department of Health and Social Care. (2022). The NHS long term plan.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Department of Statistics Singapore. (2022). Housing and living arrangements. Link<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Edmundson, William A. (2020). \u201cWhat Are \u201cThe Means of Production\u201d?*\u201d<\/a>. Journal of Political Philosophy<\/em>. 28<\/strong> (4): 422\u2013423. doi<\/a>:10.1111\/jopp.12211<\/a>. ISSN<\/a> 1467-9760<\/a>. S2CID<\/a> 212948343<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ellerman, D. (1984). The socialization of entrepreneurship: The Soviet case. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 5<\/em>(3-4), 191-211. Link<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

European Commission. (2020). Internal Energy Market: Country Factsheets. Link<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Federal Ministry of Education and Research. (2022). Higher education in Germany.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fertig, M. (2003). Who’s to blame? The determinants of German students’ achievements in the PISA 2000 study. IZA Discussion Paper No. 739<\/em>. Link<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hayek, F. A. (1944). The Road to Serfdom. University of Chicago Press. Link<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hayek, F. A. (1945). The Use of Knowledge in Society. The American Economic Review, 35<\/em>(4), 519-530. Link<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Holmes, S. (1995). Passions and constraint: On the theory of liberal democracy. University of Chicago Press. Link<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Human Rights Watch. (2022). World Report 2022: North Korea. Link<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kelly, P. (2013). The politics book<\/em>. New York: Dorling Kindersley.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kotz, D. M. (2017). The rise and fall of neoliberal capitalism. Harvard University Press. Link<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lindbeck, A. (1991). The Welfare State and the Employment Problem. The American Economic Review, 81<\/em>(2), 130-134. Link<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Malleson, T. (2014). After Occupy: Economic Democracy for the 21st Century. Oxford University Press. Link<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mankiw, N. G. (2010). Principles of economics. South-Western Cengage Learning. Link<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mohan, J. (1975). Jawaharlal Nehru and His Socialism. India International Centre Quarterly<\/em>, 2<\/em>(3), 183-192.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

National Development and Reform Commission. (2021). The 14th Five-Year Plan for Economic and Social Development of The People\u2019s Republic of China (2021\u20132025). Link<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navarro, V. (2002). The political economy of social inequalities: consequences for health and quality of life. Baywood Publishing Co.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

OECD (2021). Income inequality (indicator). doi: 10.1787\/459aa7f1-en<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Proudhon, P. (1970). What Is Property?<\/em> Dover: Sage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roberts, D. (2019). The Green New Deal, explained. Vox.Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. Basic Books.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rodriguez, F. (2018). Venezuela\u2019s Economic Crisis: What are the main factors and how can it be resolved?. Center for Economic and Policy Research. Link<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rosen, E. (2014). The guarantee of full employment under socialism. Monthly Review, 66(4), 47-58.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Svallfors, S. (2011). A More Egalitarian Sweden? Attitudes Towards Taxation under Economic Change. Acta Sociologica, 54<\/em>(2), 125-142. Link<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Winters, J. A. (2011). Oligarchy. Cambridge University Press. Link<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Wolff, R. D. (2012). Democracy at work: A cure for capitalism. Haymarket Books. Link<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

World Bank. (2022). Unemployment, total (% of total labor force) (modeled ILO estimate) – Cuba.Foster, J. B. (2002). Capitalism and ecology: From the death of earth to the production of nature. Socialism and Democracy, 16(2), 21-40.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Socialism has several pros and cons, which is why it remains an extremely controversial political ideology. Socialism\u2019s strength is that it tends to provide more equitable access to resources, while its weakness is that it often leads to market inefficiencies that decrease the productivity and prosperity of a nation\u2019s economy over time. Of course, there […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[103],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-26620","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"acf":[],"modified_by":"Chris Drew (PhD)","uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":false,"thumbnail":false,"medium":false,"medium_large":false,"large":false,"1536x1536":false,"2048x2048":false,"authorship-box-avatar":false,"authorship-box-related":false,"authorship-post-flat":false,"authorship-post-cards":false,"authorship-post-thumbs":false},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"Chris Drew (PhD)","author_link":"https:\/\/helpfulprofessor.com\/author\/chris-drew-phd\/"},"uagb_comment_info":2,"uagb_excerpt":"Socialism has several pros and cons, which is why it remains an extremely controversial political ideology. Socialism\u2019s strength is that it tends to provide more equitable access to resources, while its weakness is that it often leads to market inefficiencies that decrease the productivity and prosperity of a nation\u2019s economy over time. Of course, there…","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/helpfulprofessor.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26620","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/helpfulprofessor.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/helpfulprofessor.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/helpfulprofessor.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/helpfulprofessor.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26620"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/helpfulprofessor.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26620\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":34225,"href":"https:\/\/helpfulprofessor.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26620\/revisions\/34225"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/helpfulprofessor.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26620"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/helpfulprofessor.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=26620"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/helpfulprofessor.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=26620"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}